Prince William Conservation Alliance
Home About Us Calendar Resources Donate


PWCA has joined with residents across the county, as well as local and regional organizations, to question the benefits and highlight the impacts of the proposed road.

What's the fuss? And why is an organization focused on conservation and stream preservation so interested in a road?

The answer is simple. Infrastructure shapes development, and Prince William has designated a Development Area for growth in the county's Comprehensive Plan.

PWC supports economic development within the Development Area, but the Bi-County Parkway would spur inappropriate development in the Rural Area - where open space fields and forests are supposed to be conserved. Sprawl triggers excessive damage to natural areas, destroying streams and wildlife habitat.  

Roads and transit upgrades are necessary to cope with current congestion and predicted population growth. Taxes have been raised to deal with transportation problems, but the Bi-County Parkway does not address those problems.

Instead, this dumb-growth project diverts taxes to provide a government subsidy for speculative private development in Loudoun County. 

Northern Virginia has a land use problem, as well as a transportation problem. If we continue to stimulate jobs in Loudoun/Fairfax but build houses in Prince William, we guarantee increased traffic congestion in the future - and increased real estate taxes to deal with overcrowded schools in Prince William. 

The Bi-County Parkway is one more developer-sponsored project to "bust" the Rural Area, creating a Wild West county with no logical planning or zoning for growth.

Sprawl damages the environment, crowds schools, creates higher taxes, and increases future traffic congestion.  

The Bi-County Parkway would be a bad investment of scarce transportation funding, compared to other projects that need to be built.

So why would anyone support such a project?  

Presentation Charlie Grymes, PWCA Chairman, presented at the April 25 2013 Committee of 100 Program on the proposed Bi-County Parkway. View the powerpoint HERE.

Bi-County Parkway
(also known as the Tri-County Parkway, Northern Extension to Rte 234, Outer Beltway)

It's like trying to solve obesity by buying bigger pants.April 26 2014 -- Virginia has a new governor and a new Secretary of Transportation - but the pressure to build the Bi-County Parkway continues.

Governor McAuliffe has announced that he still likes the concept of building the road. When he visited Manassas on Earth Day on April 22, the Governor heard from the executives at Micron that they supported the road. Source: "McAuliffe: 'I have no say' on future of Bi-County Parkway" at InsideNOVA.

Micron ships computer chips produced on Godwin Drive via Dulles airport, so the $400-500 million road would facilitate Micron's shipping of one truck per day to Dulles.

Do the math: Would you rather spend $400-500 million in tax dollars to fix congestion for Prince William commuters, or subsidize One...Truck...Per...Day for companies like Micron?

VDOT is receiving public comments now on its Six Year Plan, which includes continued funding. You can send your comments now HERE and contact the governor HERE.

September 20 2013 -- Before the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) can move forward of funding/building the Bi-County Highway, the Environmental Impact Statement must be finalized. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) must approve the analysis of alternatives and concur that the impacts of the new road have been considered.

Assessment of the impacts to historical resources, and mitigation to the extent feasible, will be finalized first through approval of a document called a Section 106 Programmatic Agreement. It refers to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act.

Five agencies are negotiating the Programmatic Agreement for the Bi-County Highway - VDOT, FHWA, the National Park Service (NPS), the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP), and the Virginia State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO).

The most-recent third draft was issued for comment on August 9, 2013. It incorporated substantial revisions in the project proposal, including VDOT's commitment to keep Pageland Road open for through traffic.

In addition to the five "signatory" agencies, "consulting parties" are also invited to participate in the negotiations to identify concerns and suggest ways to address them. In the last few months, landowners affected by the proposed Bi-County Highway (including Sudley United Methodist Church) have become actively involved in the Section 106 negotiations.

Consulting parties get to contribute ideas, but in the end only the five "signatory agencies" must agree to the language.

No agency gets a simple veto in the Section 106 process. If one or more agencies will not sign the final Programmatic Agreement, there is a dispute resolution process that could ultimately allow construction of the road.

Other parties, include Prince William and Loudoun counties, could sign the Programmatic Agreement. Signing would legally bind the counties to commitments they might make in the document, such as zoning conditions along the corridor to mitigate impacts. Prince William officials are participating in the negotiations, but the Board of County Supervisors has not indicated an interest in making any binding commitments.

After a marathon all-day discussion on September 5, the five agencies will accept comments from the consulting parties until September 17. The five agencies could conclude that the latest comments do not require any revision and sign the third draft as currently written, but the consulting parties expect to see a fourth draft with clarifications/revisions that respond to their comments.

To ensure that everyone can comment on the revised plans for the Bi-County Highway, including issues other than historic preservation, VDOT is scheduling more public meetings for late September/early October.


The Bi-County Parkway is a proposed 10-mile highway that is part of the 45-mile long corridor that would connect I-95 in Prince William County to the back of Dulles Airport in Loudoun County, traveling through a part of Manassas National Battlefield Park and the Rural Crescent.